User talk:MGA73

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ~TheImaCow (talk) 20:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Omphalographer (talk) 02:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed license

[edit]

Hi, friend. Can you confirmed the license of my uploaded photos for Category:Hứa Kim Tuyền, Category:Elly Tran and Category:Lê Phương? Thank you so much. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 13:22, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the files except File:Elly Tran.png. I could not see the video. --MGA73 (talk) 16:11, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, friend. There's an archive version here. You can review it now. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 10:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, can you confirmed the license for Category:Suboi, Category:JustaTee, File:Trấn Thành 191226.png, File:TRƯỜNG GIANG.png, Category:Rhyder, Category:H'Hen Niê, Category:Đinh Ngọc Diệp, just all. I'll give you other categories next time as soon as I uploaded new photos in the future. Thank you so much. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 10:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think I got them. Don't forget to add {{YouTubeReview}} (without a space or the script does not work) and if you can also add time of crop (like 2:48) it will be a help. --MGA73 (talk) 14:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good advice. Thanks for your "fact check". I'd call you next time for license checking in the future, as soon I upload new photos. Bye. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 15:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed license, 2

[edit]

It's nice to meet you again. Can you confirmed the license of my uploaded photos for these:

  1. Category:Wowy
  2. Category:Bùi Công Nam
  3. Category:Soobin Hoàng Sơn
  4. Category:BB Trần
  5. Category:Namcito
  6. Category:Bảo Nhân
  7. Category:Uyển Ân
  8. File:H'HEN NIÊ (cropped).png
  9. File:PHAN THỊ MƠ.jpg
  10. Category:Jarinporn Joonkiat
  11. Category:Lâm Bảo Ngọc
  12. Category:Myra Tran
  13. File:DƯƠNG HOÀNG YẾN.png
  14. Category:Thùy Anh
  15. Category:Ki Eun-se
  16. Category:Han Jin
  17. Category:Pháo
  18. Category:Tlinh
  19. Category:Tóc Tiên

That's all. Thank you so much and see you in the "confirmed license" series next time. Bye. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 06:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mickey Đại Phát: Hi! I'm working on the files now. I do not think we need to add a review if it's a crop of a file that have been reviewed. --MGA73 (talk) 11:37, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, why do you think that? Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 12:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because the original file is reviewed so it has been confirmed there that the license is okay. Anyone who would like to know if license is okay can just check the original. I think we use same logic for Flickr files because the bot can't review files if they are changed. So it would require human review every time a file is cropped etc. It is ofcourse not forbidden to review a crop.
It has taken a long time to review because there was a few errors in the script (or errors in the file pages). For example the script did not work if there was no {{YouTubeReview}}. It also did not work if there was a space so it was {{YouTube Review}}. And it failed if the template {{From YouTube}} was written as {{From Youtube}} (lower case). Fixing that should make future reviews easier :-) --MGA73 (talk) 12:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mickey Đại Phát: I think I got them all now except a few in Category:Pháo because video is not available in my country. --MGA73 (talk) 13:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What video? Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 13:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The one for File:PHÁO - YOUR FACE SOUNDS FAMILIAR VIETNAM 2020 P1.jpg etc. --MGA73 (talk) 13:46, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Video is archived. Don't worry, friend. You can see it. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 13:54, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly not. I tried :-) --MGA73 (talk) 13:54, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What? Even in Wayback Machine you can't find? Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 14:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If so, the video you've mentioned have CC, too. 100% confirmed. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 14:12, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That won't help me when I can't see the video. --MGA73 (talk) 16:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh dear. Anyway, thank you so much for your reviewing, and see you in the reviewed license series next time. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 10:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CFDL

[edit]

Copy from my own talk page::::Now I have a question:

Even now, CFDL is the first license offered in the menu.
Therefore I believed that it were the most approved one and have used it for all own photos and drawings.
Since when is it disapproved?--Ulamm (talk) 20:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I replied on your talk page. --MGA73 (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Michael,

I answered your question on my talkpage. I had asked on the GraphicsLab here if they could sharpen this image but no one wants to touch it. If you know someone who has the professional Adobe Photoshop software, perhaps they can download this image, sharpen the image and reupload it on the same file. If not, its quite OK. Unfortunately, the British Museum does not allow Commercial use of this rare image in their collection. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thats a shame! The best place should be the lab. I hope with AI getting more used we will have more users that can fix it. --MGA73 (talk) 05:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I checked a few AI software programs but they all only work on a subscription basis. I don't see the need to pay for using just one photo. This image is one of the few images that bears king Amenemhat IV by name since he ruled Egypt for only 9 years and 3 months during the powerful 12th dynasty of Egypt. This is the only other photo on flickr of this object and it is even more out of focus. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Same here. Right now I also see no reason to pay for this tool. --MGA73 (talk) 14:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: I used the free trial version of Canva (which is supposed to be one of the 10 best alternatives to Adobe Photoshop) and uploaded this sharpened image below. I don't know if it is an improvement. Any idea? The image size fell from 412 KB (the original photo) to 180 KB (this new image) and I don't know if this is good or bad.
  • File:Amenemhat IV plaque.jpg

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think it is better! But still a bit blurred. I think it will be hard to improve without paying a lot of money or spending many hours on it. --MGA73 (talk) 15:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]